That's not an extraordinary score, but considering this is a $399 laptop, without the benefit of Intel's very efficient Core i-series technology, it's pretty impressive. In our video-playback battery drain test, it ran for 4 hours and 23 minutes. The one bright spot in the Satellite C655's performance is its battery life. Yes, it'll work for basic office and online work, but I suspect those extra seconds spent waiting will eventually become extremely aggravating.
TOSHIBA SATELLITE C655 RECOVERY DISK WINDOWS
In anecdotal use, the C655 often felt sluggish, especially when opening Windows menus and performing system tasks. In this price range, you're likely to find laptops with AMD's A4 CPU, or for a little more, an Intel Core i3.Ĭonfine the comparisons to systems in that general ballpark, and the Toshiba C655 seems usable, but keep in mind a mainstream Core i5 can run our multitasking test nearly three times as fast. But, keep in mind that that's because we kept the competition reasonable. That's actually not the case, and the C655 did well in our single-app tests. You might expect the 1.6GHz Intel Celeron B815 CPU in this system to come in dead last in any of our CNET Labs benchmarks. You can live without the other ports and connections, but the lack of HDMI is frankly shocking in a 2012 laptop, and means it'll be hard to get content onto another screen if you're using this as a cheap multimedia playback device. Forget about USB 3.0, Bluetooth, or Intel Wireless Display - there isn't even an HDMI port. The left and right mouse buttons are large, together being wider than the pad itself, but their convex plastic shape wobbles under even light clicking.ĭon't expect too many, or really even any, frills on the Satellite C655. A separate number pad sits to the right of the keyboard, which probably counts as a featured "extra" on a $399 laptop.įor a 15-inch laptop, the touch pad was surprisingly small, although two-finger gestures were a lot zippier than I expected. The keys feel shallow and clacky, with a lot of flex near the middle of the keyboard, but key size and overall placement are good. Its keyboard has wide, flat keys that run up against each other, in sharp contrast to the island-style keys found on nearly every other current laptop (including Toshiba's other models). The past six months or so have seen a real trend toward better designs, materials, and workmanship in even inexpensive laptops, thanks in large part to reasonably priced ultrabooks, making this system look and feel even more low-budget. For simple e-mail and Facebook-surfing, it'll suffice, and I found its battery life was surprisingly good (not that it has any high-end components to power).Īll those points remain true, with an additional caveat. To be fair, the Satellite C655-S5542 runs, if slowly, and even plays back HD video. Usually when playing in price ranges this low, I'd suggest looking at an 11-inch ultraportable, such as HP's dm1z, where the limited performance would feel more reasonable. Either would be a much better mid- to long-term investment. Standard Core i3 i5 systems can be found for not too much more - Lenovo has some good deals on its Essential G570, currently $499 for a Core i3 model and $559 for a Core i5. Yes, Intel still makes Celeron chips (and Atom chips, as well), although it's hard to think of a situation where we'd strongly recommend one.
![toshiba satellite c655 recovery disk toshiba satellite c655 recovery disk](https://s1.manualzz.com/store/data/002732664_1-5bcc00db7e8dbf7bc8276ed2ceefee97.png)
Instead, it has an Intel Celeron B815, a dual-core chip that runs at 1.6GHz. Most importantly, this laptop doesn't have an Intel Core i3 or i5 CPU, not even last year's version. Of course, a few corners are cut at that price.